Thanks to Seb for the reference.
D2L has posted the latest filings from both sides, detailing their competing interpretations of Blackboard’s patent. (Before you can decide if somebody has infringed on a patent, you first have to decide what that patent means.) The judge will evaluate these competing claims in what’s known as a Markman hearing.
I haven’t read the documents, but according to Seb, D2L’s filing references the Wikipedia page on the History of Virtual Learning Environments that the ed tech community collectively created in response to the Blackboard patent. If you contributed to that page (and hundreds of people did), then give yourself a pat on the back. You played a small role in the legal history of our profession.
[…] Blackboard专利权案件进入了新的步骤。Blackboard 公布了一份文件,阐述了它认为它的专利权涵盖的范围,诉讼另一方Desire2Learn对该文件作出了回应。D2L的回答中最尖锐的一点在于, “Blackboard已承认,它在第138号专利权案件中主张的为整个领域带来的小创新,只是与以下概念相联系:使用‘多重预设用户角色’来为系统提供安全性”,并且引用了Blackboard对该点的说明。与此同时,Blackboard集中关注LMS的“角色”,试图将其解释得尽可能的范围广泛。还值得注意的是,D2L在回答中引用了Wikipedia中的VLE(虚拟学习环境)历史页面。更多信息见Michael Feldstein.Seb Schmoller, Fortnightly Mailing June 21, 2007 [原文链接] [Tags: Patents, Blackboard Inc., Copyrights, Wikipedia, Security Issues, Patents, Desire2Learn] [参与评论](danny 译) […]