• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

e-Literate

Present is Prologue

  • Home
  • About
  • Read More
    • Big Picture
      • Outcomes
      • Policy
      • Research
    • Business & Economics
    • Academics & Academia
      • OPMs & Program Support
      • Pedagogy
      • Strategy & Change Management
    • Ed Tech
      • Curricular-Materials
      • Interoperability
      • Learning Analytics
      • Learning Apps
      • LMS & Learning Platforms
    • Bits & Bytes
      • From the Editors
      • Recommended Reading
      • Upcoming Events
  • Get Help (Services)
  • Do More (EEP)
  • un-Webinars
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / Archives for artificial intelligence

artificial intelligence

Postscript on College Rankings Revisited: Description of methods

By Phil Hill. Posted on January 19, 2018

Given the interest in guest post on College Rankings done by AI, we point out paper with deeper description of algorithms, and we answer some questions.

College Rankings Revisited: What Might an Artificial Intelligence Think?

By Steve Lattanzio. Posted on January 16, 2018

What if, instead of relying on US & World Report subjective methods, we tried to rely on more object data analysis for college rankings? Here is one exploration of possibilities, using neural networks and the College Scorecard.

MOOC Mania: Stanford AI Course Creates Media Sensation Two Years Ago

By Phil Hill. Posted on August 4, 2013

It was two years ago, give or take a week, that the MOOC mania started. Think about the effects on higher education of this seminal event and how short a time it has been. In the past two years online education and ed tech have moved into the front pages, being discussed in the front […]

Six Ways the edX Announcement Gets Automated Essay Grading Wrong

By Elijah Mayfield. Posted on April 8, 2013

Last week, edX made a splashy spectacle of an announcement about automated essay grading, leaving educators fuming. Let’s rethink their claims.  “Give Professors a break,” the New York Times suggested in this joint press release from edX, Harvard, and MIT. The breathless story weaves a tale of robo-professors taking over the grading process, leaving professors […]

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe by email

RSS EEP News

  • iDesign Contributes the iDea Book and Declares “Scholarship Over SWAG”
  • Carnegie Mellon and Lumen Learning Announce EEP-Relevant Collaboration
  • Forbes Column on the CMU Contribution
  • EdSurge Covers the EEP Summit
  • CMU Announces $100 Million OpenSimon Contribution at EEP Summit

Most commented

  • Six Ways the edX Announcement Gets Automated Essay Grading Wrong
  • The Four Student Archetypes Emerging in MOOCs
  • Blackboard Patents the LMS
  • Does Google Wave Mean the End of the LMS?
  • Why Pearson’s OpenClass Is a Big Deal
  • Emerging Student Patterns in MOOCs: A Graphical View
  • Stephen Downes Missed the Point
  • The Most Thorough Summary (to date) of MOOC Completion Rates

Recent Comments

  • Horus Msemaje on The Chegg Situation is Worse Than You Think
  • fritzumbc on The Chegg Situation is Worse Than You Think
  • Michael Feldstein on The Chegg Situation is Worse Than You Think
  • Jim Julius on The Chegg Situation is Worse Than You Think
  • Don Gorges on The Chegg Situation is Worse Than You Think

 


»Editorial Policies

 

Creative Commons License

 

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Creative Commons License

 

  • Home
  • About
  • Read More
  • Get Help (Services)
  • Do More (EEP)
  • un-Webinars
  • Contact