• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

e-Literate

Present is Prologue

  • Home
  • About
  • Get Help (Services)
  • Do More (EEP)
    • ALDA Design/Build Workshop Series
  • un-Webinars
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Clarifications On UC Berkeley’s Accessibility Decision To Restrict Video Access

By Phil Hill. Posted on March 22, 2017

The news headlines sounded terrible. The truth is more complicated.

Recommended Reading: CBE platforms represent a truly niche market

By Phil Hill. Posted on March 20, 2017

Triggered by the news that we broke here at e-Literate that “Ellucian Stops Support for Brainstorm, its CBE platform”, Carl Straumsheim at Inside Higher Ed has a valuable follow-up article today looking more broadly at the CBE platform market. In “Finding a Niche in a Niche Market”, Carl interviews chief product and strategy officer at Ellucian, […]

Recommended Reading: Signs of Restraint in the Analytics Hype Machine

By O'Neal Spicer. Posted on March 13, 2017

Mike Sharkey’s recent post on the Blackboard blog site, “Analytics isn’t a thing,” triggered by an epiphany he had while reading the latest NMC Horizon Report, suggests that we might finally be seeing a maturation in the much-hyped analytics space. Rather than viewing analytics as a product category in and of itself, Mike concludes that […]

Why Ed Tech Will Fail to Transform Education (for Now)

By Michael Feldstein. Posted on March 13, 2017

The push to solve education’s problems through providing better tech is a little like trying to invent the pharmaceutical industry in absence of a modern medical profession. In this post, we imagine what that might have looked like. (Spoiler alert: It wouldn’t have worked.)

Recommended Reading: IHE coverage of NBER paper and critiques

By Phil Hill. Posted on March 1, 2017

Two good pieces in Inside Higher Ed look into Caroline Hoxby’s controversial NBER report. Neither of them is vindicating.

One More Thing on NBER Report: Where did pre-2011 data come from?

By Phil Hill. Posted on February 27, 2017

The closer we look, the worse it seems.

New NBER Study on Online Education is Deeply Flawed

By Phil Hill. Posted on February 27, 2017

Caroline Hoxby from Stanford University just published a working paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) claiming to analyze “The Returns to Online Postsecondary Education”. This report is a hot mess that that conflates online students, enrollments, programs, institutions and uses a bizarre and misleading data set for its analysis.

« Previous Page
Next Page »
Creative Commons License

 

  • Home
  • About
  • Get Help (Services)
  • Do More (EEP)
  • un-Webinars
  • Contact