• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

e-Literate

Present is Prologue

  • Home
  • About
  • Get Help (Services)
  • Do More (EEP)
    • ALDA Design/Build Workshop Series
  • un-Webinars
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Unizin RFP For LMS: An offering to appease the procurement gods?

By Phil Hill. Posted on December 30, 2015

Well this was interesting: Unizin issues an RFP for "Enterprise and Multitentant LMS" https://t.co/kRVSyzQgYI& I owe my wife an engagement ring soon — Phil Hill (@PhilOnEdTech) December 30, 2015 In a blog post from Monday, Unizin announced a public Request For Proposals (RFP) to solicit bids for an enterprise and multitenant LMS. The RFP states its […]

Three Views of Top 10 e-Literate Posts in 2015

By Phil Hill. Posted on December 30, 2015

It’s the year end, and I have writer’s block. Like many people, I would much prefer to play with numbers than get work done. Instead of just sharing the Top 10 or Top 20 blog posts in terms of 2015 page views, however, I thought it would be interesting to take three different views this […]

McGraw Hill’s New Personalized Learning Authoring Product

By Michael Feldstein. Posted on December 19, 2015

In what has to be the softest launch ever, McGraw Hill has been quietly talking about their new personalized learning authoring system. If you ask them when it will be available to all customers, they will tell you “right now.” But since it doesn’t even have a name yet, I’m not sure how customers would […]

Georgia Tech and Udacity MOOC Degree: Missing targets but still worth watching

By Phil Hill. Posted on December 14, 2015

Melissa Korn wrote an article yesterday in the Wall Street Journal giving a progress report on that Georgia Tech / Udacity MOOC degree (the master’s in computer science). The Georgia Tech online computer-science program is relatively massive: It has 2,789 students enrolled this semester, compared with 312 in the campus-based version. It’s on track to […]

Personalized Learning and the Teacher

By Michael Feldstein. Posted on December 14, 2015

A few weeks ago, Jonathan Rees wrote a post calling out that, no matter what potential of so-called “personalized learning” for improving student outcomes, there is a potential—and a temptation—for it to be abused as a method of lowering (labor) costs in a way that also lowers educational quality and effectiveness. This is a serious and realistic concern, particularly as long as personalized learning is framed as a product rather than a set of teaching strategies.

LMS Market Updates, Dec 2015

By Phil Hill. Posted on December 10, 2015

There seems to be a series of news and analysis on the LMS higher education market worth summarizing. Major Adoption News I posted last weekend about University of Phoenix (UoP) and their LMS. UoP is well-known for being the biggest user of a homegrown LMS for well over a decade, but in the past several years […]

Plus Ca Change: About that ed tech adoption curve

By Phil Hill. Posted on December 7, 2015

All the same We take our chances Laughed at by Time, Tricked by Circumstances Plus ca change, Plus c’est la meme chose The more that things change, The more they stay the same – Rush, Circumstances Over the past few years I have increased my usage of the technology adoption curve – originating from Everett Rogers and extended […]

« Previous Page
Next Page »
Creative Commons License

 

  • Home
  • About
  • Get Help (Services)
  • Do More (EEP)
  • un-Webinars
  • Contact